Showing posts with label Debbie Wasserman Schultz. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Debbie Wasserman Schultz. Show all posts

Wednesday, August 3, 2011

Boehner Opts To Leave The FAA In The Lurch


The Republicans were perfectly happy to scurry out of town for a month with the unexpected and unprecedented victory Barack Obama handed them on a silver platter. Obama and his apologists are-- laughably-- trying to deny this is a huge win for the GOP. Right after the vote one of Capitol Hill's most notorious hacks and most practiced liars, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, was telling TV viewers it was a vote to protect Social Security and Medicare and Yay, my-best-friend-Gabby-is-back-America-is-great. Anyway, Chris Hayes sat in for Rachel Maddow Monday night and he came up with a rather compelling graphic (above) that I'd love to see Wasserman Schultz explain.

So as I was saying before I interrupted myself with a detour down Wasserman Schultz Mania Lane, the GOP has scurried out of town to celebrate their startling victory. And to add insult to injury they decided to leave the closing of the FAA unresolved 'til they wander back in September. Let's start with a look at what newspapers are saying about the Republican Party's latest nihilistic threat against the normal functioning of the government:
Last week, contractors across the country were told to stop work on critical airport modernization projects after Congress failed to pass legislation giving the FAA the authority necessary for work to continue. Dozens of “stop work orders” were issued for major projects designed to build and modernize control towers and other aviation infrastructure from coast to coast. Construction workers, engineers and planners were told not to come to worksites across the country after the FAA was forced to issue stop work orders on projects ranging from the construction of new air traffic control towers to the rehabilitation and modernization of air traffic facilities. Nearly 4,000 FAA personnel, many needed to oversee various aspects of these projects, were furloughed beginning on July 23. The Association of General Contractors estimates that as many as 70,000 construction workers are unable to work because of Congress’ inaction. Stopping work on these projects could significantly increase the ultimate costs of construction for taxpayers. 
                                     
“Since 2007, lawmakers have been unable to reach agreement on a broad measure to finance the Federal Aviation Administration, so they have passed 20 temporary ‘extensions.’ Yes, you read that correctly. Twenty. But, as of 10 days ago, Congress couldn't even agree on another extension. Compromise […] can't come soon enough. Like spoiled children, members of Congress have stamped their feet and scored their points while other people pay for their inaction. If the lawmakers were back in school, they'd deserve to be in the time-out corner.”
     --USA Today, August 2, 2011
 
“The FAA is “another victim of partisan politics in Congress... And here we are. A prolonged halt to needed airport modernization is not in the country’s interest.”
     --Washington Post, July 26, 2011 

“Now Congress has managed to bring much of the Federal Aviation Administration to a standstill… locally, needed expansion and resurfacing projects at Orlando's two commercial airports could atrophy mirroring the inertia of Republican and Democratic congressional leaders who can't-- or won't-- move their way around the labor issues and subsidies for rural airports that separate them. Pathetic.”
     --Orlando Sentinel, July 27, 2011 
 
“The F.A.A. has also had to furlough some 4,000 workers. Needed airport construction projects-- to maintain runways, build new traffic control towers and upgrade other facilities-- have been halted across the country. The only good news is that the air traffic control system is still working because traffic controllers are paid from the Aviation Trust Fund, which still has a positive balance.”
     --New York Times, July 27, 2011 

“At a time when jobs are scarce and the construction industry is ailing, this is the worst time possible for a halt in funding…The real problem is Congress’ inability to iron out partisan disputes, a failure of governance at the most basic level…These are serious issues, but surely reasonable lawmakers can come to an agreement without shutting down a vital government agency.”
     --Miami Herald, July 27, 2011  

“The way the FAA shutdown has come about is anything but good government. And it could damage the fragile economic recovery… Federal lawmakers need to step up and continue funding for the agency.”
     --The Denver Post, July 28, 2011 

“Americans are frustrated with our congressional representation, and holding the world's best air travel system hostage magnifies just how inept and ineffective Washington has become.”
     --Charleston Daily Mail, July 26, 2011 
 
“One of the greatest strengths of the U.S. economy has long been its transportation system… But how much longer will that be true if petty political differences can't even be put aside long enough to keep an agency that is critical to that system on the job?”
     --Reno Gazette Journal, July 26, 2011 
 
“Congress’ failure to act and pass a short-term extension is preventing critical improvement projects from getting off the ground – projects that support and create good-paying jobs in Colorado and across the country.”
     --The Denver Post, July 28, 2011
  
“Failure to pass a clean extension bill is needlessly putting Americans out of work in a fragile economy.”
     --The Sacramento Bee, July 29, 2011
 
“…It is simply outrageous that members of Congress would put an ideological argument above the important work the FAA does… And how, as our nation sluggishly continues to try to recover from the recession, can you throw 4,000 FAA employees, and an unknown number of contractors, out of work? They are all just victims of the current political climate, where an inability to compromise has become an inability to govern.”    
     --Press of Atlantic City, July 29, 2011

“…The inability of Congress to reach a compromise on raising the nation’s debt ceiling isn’t the only example of how partisanship and, dare we say, sheer incompetence is getting in the way of conducting the people’s business. Not to mention interfering with its much-repeated pledge to put America back to work. That became crystal clear this past weekend, when the Federal Aviation Administration was forced to furlough roughly 4,000 workers…”
     --Nashua Telegraph, July 28, 2011
 
“Congressional squabbling is blocking reauthorization of funding for the Federal Aviation Administration. As a result, $2.5 billion in airport improvement projects have been halted and about 4,000 FAA workers have been furloughed. The issues ought to be resolved quickly... Essential transportation services should not be held hostage in the meantime.”
     --The Detroit News, July 29, 2011
 
“Unlike the debt ceiling standoff, with its competing claims of trillions in cuts, the FAA impasse involves only a tiny slice of the federal budget. Yet its effects are plain -- workers furloughed, construction stopped -- just to make a misbegotten point.”
     --The NV Daily, July, 28, 2011 

“Such sorry decision making shows how out of touch politicians are with average Americans. Jobs are the No. 1 concern across our great nation and Congress effectively killed public and private jobs by failing to reauthorize this [FAA] law.”
     --The Billings Gazette, July 29, 2011

Boehner, Cantor and their empowered cronies DO NOT CARE. Nothing, short of the voters, can stop them now. And that's a long way off. The $200 million per week in lost ticket taxes? They're perfectly happy to see their right-wing allies at Delta collecting and pocketing those taxes for themselves, knowing full well that Delta will kick back some of the dough to right-wing organizations and right-wing politicians. Delta, after all, has quite a record as THE anti-working family airline-- and as a very active fascist tool in the right-wing network.
It should come as no surprise that Delta Airlines is using its lobbyists and campaign donations to try to overturn a decision that makes it less difficult for workers at airports to organize. That's what corporate America does, even during times of economic hardship-- they maximize profits at the expense of good jobs. But Delta's lobbying has taken it one step further. With millions out of work, Delta's opposition to the legislation to keep the Federal Aviation Administration running has stopped it cold-- and Congress will conclude its business for the summer without passing it. That means thousands of workers responsible for the safety and operation of airports all over the country are getting furloughed without pay.

Delta's been spending money wisely to try to overturn the decision to let workers organize more easily. They spent $1.6 million on lobbying during the first half of 2011, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. (Over the past ten years they spent at least $32 million to influence Washington.) Their PAC has given $826,243 to members of Congress since 2000. Adding additional incentive for Republicans in Congress to stand with them, Richard Anderson, Delta's CEO, made a $5,000 contribution to the Senate Republican's campaign committee earlier this year-- apparently his first one ever.

It's yet another example where common sense gets a back seat-- or perhaps is left on stand-by-- to corporate CEOs and the lobbyists lining members' pockets.

Even Republican Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison (TX) was aghast at Boehner's dishonable move! Hutchison:
"[I]t is not honorable for the House to send an extraneous amendment on an FAA extension, and shut down airports that are being repaired and built in our country, jeopardizing an estimated 75,000 jobs, jeopardizing the certification of a major new airplane that wants to get out there and start being used, and an airport trust fund, an aviation trust fund that will lose over a billion dollars because we're not collecting the tax, and the airlines are pocketing the money by having a higher ticket charge, mostly, they may not all be doing that, but most of them are. And Mr. President, that's just not right. And we're gonna have to make that up because there are contracts pending that are gonna have to be paid for. It's not fiscally responsible and it's not honorable, and it's time for us to pass a clean extension of the FAA.

 

Tuesday, August 2, 2011

Who Lied About How They Would Vote On The Satan Sandwich?


Congratulations to Gabby Giffords for making it back to Congress to vote and being the surprise-- except for Wasserman Schultz and Pelosi-- 95th Democratic Party vote for the Republican agenda, tying the 95 actual Democrats who opposed it. As my old pal Susan Klein remarked on Twitter, it was the most dramatic comeback performance since Judy Garland at Carnegie Hall in 1961. Gabby's appearance meant much more to the assembled politicians-- actually, of both parties-- than Judy's did to anyone but the gays. It was a good moment for the nation-- and a great smokescreen for the supposed defenders of working people, like Wasserman Schultz-- who could use it to change the subject when anyone wondered why she had just given John Boehner 98% of what he wanted.

Debbie Wasserman Schultz's vote was never in doubt of course. She's the ultimate political hack and always has been. Rahm didn't pick her for a leadership role at the DCCC and Obama didn't pick her to head the DNC because she's got an independent spirit or a conscience. She's very nice on women's issues, though... more than one can say about many of the Blue Dogs she relentlessly promotes. But at least Debbie never held out hope that she might take the side of working families and reject the Satan Sandwich. How about the duplicitous Democrats who signed the Grijalva-Ellison letter to Pelosi pledging to never vote for any bill that jeopardizes Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid, which, despite indignant protestations to the contrary by the likes of Debbie Wasserman Schultz, this bill certainly does? The Caucus itself only lost 15 members in the vote yesterday but some of the non-Caucus signers found Wasserman Schultz's and Obama's arguments to back everything Boehner wanted suddenly very persuasive.

The vast majority of the 87 Democrats who signed the letter were true to their word and voted NO-- against the Satan Sandwich. Who broke their word and betrayed their constituents?
Karen Bass (CA)
David Cicciline (RI)
William Lacy Clay (MO)
Jerry Costello (IL)
Mark Critz (PA)
Danny Davis (IL)
Ted Deutch (FL)
Lloyd Doggett (TX)
Chaka Fattah (PA)
John Garamendi (CA)
Luis Gutierrez (IL)
Mazie Hirono (HI)
Sheila Jackson Lee (TX)
Eddie Bernice Johnson (TX)
Hank Johnson (GA)
Dale Kildee (MI)
Jim Langevin (RI)
Stephen Lynch (MA)
Cedric Richmond (LA)
Steve Rothman (NJ)
Frederica Wilson (FL)
David Wu (OR)

A bigger shock came when three Blue Dogs who rarely take the side of working families over Big Business came over to the progressive side in Monday's night's vote-- Leonard Boswell (IA), Dennis Cardoza (CA) and, most shocking of all, Mike McIntyre (NC).


Even before Kissinger's infamous tweet, Matt Taibbi made the same point in Rolling Stone.
The popular take is that Obama is a weak leader of a weak party who was pushed around by canny right-wing extremists. Observers like pollster Sydney Greenberg portray Obama and the Democrats as a group of politically tone-deaf bureaucrats who fail because the public associates them with a corrupt government that benefits the rich and connected.

The Democrats, Greenberg argues, could change their situation by showing the public that they genuinely represent the interests of ordinary working people... But to a bunch of hired stooges put in office to lend an air of democratic legitimacy to what has essentially become a bureaucratic-oligarchic state, what good does such advice do? Would it have made sense to send the Supreme Soviet under Andropov or Brezhnyev a list of policy ideas for enhancing the civil liberties of Soviet citizens?

The Democrats aren't failing to stand up to Republicans and failing to enact sensible reforms that benefit the middle class because they genuinely believe there's political hay to be made moving to the right. They're doing it because they do not represent any actual voters. I know I've said this before, but they are not a progressive political party, not even secretly, deep inside. They just play one on television.

For evidence, all you have to do is look at this latest fiasco.

The Republicans in this debt debate fought like wolves or alley thugs, biting and scratching and using blades and rocks and shards of glass and every weapon they could reach.

The Democrats, despite sitting in the White House, the most awesome repository of political power on the planet, didn't fight at all. They made a show of a tussle for a good long time-- as fixed fights go, you don't see many that last into the 11th and 12th rounds, like this one did-- but at the final hour, they let out a whimper and took a dive.

We probably need to start wondering why this keeps happening. Also, this: if the Democrats suck so bad at political combat, then how come they continue to be rewarded with such massive quantities of campaign contributions? When the final tally comes in for the 2012 presidential race, who among us wouldn't bet that Barack Obama is going to beat his Republican opponent in the fundraising column very handily? At the very least, he won't be out-funded, I can almost guarantee that.

And what does that mean? Who spends hundreds of millions of dollars for what looks, on the outside, like rank incompetence?

It strains the imagination to think that the country's smartest businessmen keep paying top dollar for such lousy performance. Is it possible that by "surrendering" at the 11th hour and signing off on a deal that presages deep cuts in spending for the middle class, but avoids tax increases for the rich, Obama is doing exactly what was expected of him?

So let me go back to the Blue America statement penned for us by Alan Grayson:
We who sign this make the following pledge, to the voters of our districts and to all the American People:

We Are Against Any and Every Cut to Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid benefits. Not today, not tomorrow, and not ever. No way, no how. Not on your life, and not on mine, because both your life and my life may depend on it.

N-E-V-E-R.

Every Blue America candidate has either signed this letter or issued their own statement in their own words equally powerful. Blue America won't be endorsing any incumbents who voted for the Satan Sandwich and won't be endorsing any challengers who don't embrace this pledge to the American people. It's the bottom line. I still hope Mazie Hirono beats Ed Case in Hawaii, of course, but as of yesterday, Blue America ceased raising funds for her. Give your donations to Bernie Sanders instead. One of our Blue America-endorsed candidates, Nick Ruiz (D-FL), the first to sign the pledge, went on to explain what's gone wrong the day after the vote:
All of the American people can’t be wrong.

All of their needs can’t be wrong.

What is wrong is the turn down the Republican rabbit hole. Lost, we are. BHO abdicates executive responsibility by refusing to act to the point of inertia. Republican John Boehner (OH-8) and Company acted extremely. All Cuts are therefore “IN.” In accompaniment, HSBC announces they will shed 30,000 jobs in 2011-2012. This is the coming Age of Austerity. What a howler- cut New Deal programs at the very same time that practically every large corporation in America is cutting jobs and hording cash. ‘Satan sandwich’ anyone?

The American people could be celebrating a democratic victory, if there was one to recognize. Instead, we are faced with the nuts and bolts of the reality of being sold-out under the auspices of a short term ceiling hike and a long term hatchet committee with an appetite for New Deal destruction.

How to put it back together again, as they tear it apart? 2012.

The 2012 playbook is very simple: reject any and every candidate that stands in the way of progressive democracy. Reserve your support; however you give it, for those progressive Democratic candidates that would act in your interest.

You’ll have to be savvy-– because the all too corporate party machinery will be out to trick you with the ruse of mechanical candidates and party-line robots. But the power to represent us is yours to take or give. The power is in your vote. It’s in your contributions. It’s in the time you volunteer. It’s in your letters to the editors of newspapers and blogs.

Hope? Change? No, we haven’t. But I promise you-- we will.